Guidelines and Grading Rubric
The purpose of this assignment is for learners to: Develop professional presentation/communication skills.
Demonstrate an advancing understanding of pathophysiological processes of body systems that result in the diagnosis and treatment of patients who present with these disorders in these systems.
Demonstrate the ability to analyze the literature to obtain the most current, evidence-based resources on the assigned disease process
Demonstrate and practice professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of peers.
1. Analyze pathophysiological mechanisms associated with select disease states
5. Relate research findings to the management of patients with complex pathophysiologic dysfunction
Students are to review at least one peer Disease Process Presentation using the guidelines below. The peer review is due by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Address the following criteria:
When reviewing a peer’s presentation, choose two of the criteria below and create questions, comments and feedback that center’s on the peer’s content provided under the chosen criteria. In your posting, clearly identify the two criteria chosen for the review. Suggested ways to review a peer’s presentation is to expound on the content provided under a given criterion by providing additional information or other points that could have also been included; ask pertinent questions that allows the peer to clarify and further expound on the criteria; if you disagree with a point made by a peer, explain why and provide further information supported by evidence to defend your position.
1. Introduce the disease with a brief definition and description.
2. Discuss the risk factors and the connection to the etiology of the initial injury to the cell/tissue/organ.
3. Discuss health care provider implications for prevention of the disease.
4. Show the progression from the initial injury to the defect in the tissue, organ and system functioning.
5. Link changes in the tissue, organ, and system functioning to the initial presenting signs and symptoms seen in primary care of the disease.
6. Provide a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed.
7. Provide a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used to treat and manage the disease.
8. Summarizes the disease on final slide with concluding remarks; includes implication for nurse practitioner practice.
9. Utilizes at least two current (within 5 years), peer-review scholarly sources to support presentation content.
10. Reference slide and in-text citations depict references correctly cited according to APA.
|Criterion||Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance||Exceeds Very good or high level of performance||Meets Satisfactory level of performance||Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance||Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance|
|Total Points Possible = 50|
|Application of Course Knowledge||20 Points||18 Points||16 Points||8 Points||0 Points|
|Clearly states the two assignment criteria to be reviewed. Provides feedback using at least one of the following techniques: *Expounds on the content provided under a given criterion by providing additional information or other points that could have been included. *Asks pertinent questions that allows the peer to clarify and further expound on the criteria. *When disagreeing with a point made by a peer, explains why and provides further information supported by evidence to defend position. All comments are presented with logical thought process.||Clearly states the two assignment criteria to be reviewed, but comments may lack some applicability to the selected criteria; or misses one criteria in some way.||The comments provided has limited perspective, unclear linkages, insights and/or applicability to topic and selected criteria or does not meet one or more of the criteria of the assignment.||The comments contain inaccurate information and is not consistent with current practice or with the assignment guidelines. No clear linkages provided; analysis is minimal.||The comments offer no insight or application to the assignment.|
|Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)||15 Points||13 Points||12 Points||6 Points||0 Points|
|Appropriate scholarly literature is present when providing analysis and feedback to the peer’s presentation. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited||Analysis is partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited||Analysis is partially supported by evidence. Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. Guidelines not used. In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.||Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support comments and feedback to peer.||Presentation contains no evidence-based practice reference or citation.|
|Professionalism||10 Points||9 Points||8 Points||4 Points||0 Points|
|The comments provided to peer are constructive and reflect respect and collegiality. The comments are relevant and pertain to the criteria reviewed and flows in a logical manner.||The comments provided to peer are constructive and reflect respect and collegiality. May provided one unclear comment or a respond not entirely relevant to the criteria reviewed.||The comments to peer are lacking and may be unclear or irrelevant to the criteria selected for review.||The comments to peer are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic and concepts are difficult to follow.||The comments to peer are unclear to follow and are irrelevant to the topic and concepts.|
|Grammar, Syntax, APA||5 points||4 points||3 points||1 point||0 points|
|APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.||Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.||Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.||Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.||Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.|
|Total Points Possible= 50|
Writing quality papers is a TOP priority. One expert takes one order at a time.
The service package includes topic brainstorm, research, drafting, proofreading, plagiarism check, citation formatting, and revisions.
We appreciate how valuable your time is. Hence, we make sure all custom papers are 100% original and delivered within the agreed time frameRead more
Each paper is written from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
We see it as our duty to follow all instruction the client provides. If you feel the completed paper does not meet your exact requirements, we will revise the paper if you let us know about the problem within 14 business days from the date of delivery.Read more
Your email is safe, we use your personal data for legal purposes only and in accordance with personal data protection law. Your payment details are also secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
You can easily contact us with any question or issues you need to be addressed. Also, you have the opportunity to communicate directly with assigned writer, e-mail us, submit revision requests, chat with us online, or call our toll-free on our site. We are always available to our customers.Read more