Week 6 Disease Process Peer Review

Week 6  Disease Process Peer Review

Guidelines and Grading Rubric

The purpose of this assignment is for learners to: Develop professional presentation/communication skills.

Demonstrate an advancing understanding of pathophysiological processes of body systems that result in the diagnosis and treatment of patients who present with these disorders in these systems.

Demonstrate the ability to analyze the literature to obtain the most current, evidence-based resources on the assigned disease process

Demonstrate and practice professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of peers.

Course Outcomes

1. Analyze pathophysiological mechanisms associated with select disease states

5. Relate research findings to the management of patients with complex pathophysiologic dysfunction

Total Points Possible: 50 Points

Due Date: Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT

Requirements

Students are to review at least one peer Disease Process Presentation using the guidelines below. The peer review is due by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Address the following criteria:

When reviewing a peer’s presentation, choose two of the criteria below and create questions, comments and feedback that center’s on the peer’s content provided under the chosen criteria. In your posting, clearly identify the two criteria chosen for the review. Suggested ways to review a peer’s presentation is to expound on the content provided under a given criterion by providing additional information or other points that could have also been included; ask pertinent questions that allows the peer to clarify and further expound on the criteria; if you disagree with a point made by a peer, explain why and provide further information supported by evidence to defend your position.

1. Introduce the disease with a brief definition and description.

2. Discuss the risk factors and the connection to the etiology of the initial injury to the cell/tissue/organ.

3. Discuss health care provider implications for prevention of the disease.

4. Show the progression from the initial injury to the defect in the tissue, organ and system functioning.

5. Link changes in the tissue, organ, and system functioning to the initial presenting signs and symptoms seen in primary care of the disease.

6. Provide a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed.

7. Provide a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used to treat and manage the disease.

8. Summarizes the disease on final slide with concluding remarks; includes implication for nurse practitioner practice.

9. Utilizes at least two current (within 5 years), peer-review scholarly sources to support presentation content.

10. Reference slide and in-text citations depict references correctly cited according to APA.

Directions and Grading Criteria

  Criterion Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds Very good or high level of performance Meets Satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
  Total Points Possible = 50  
  Application of Course Knowledge       20 Points 18 Points   16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
  Clearly states the two assignment criteria to be reviewed. Provides feedback using at least one of the following techniques: *Expounds on the content provided under a given criterion by providing additional information or other points that could have been included. *Asks pertinent questions that allows the peer to clarify and further expound on the criteria. *When disagreeing with a point made by a peer, explains why and provides further information supported by evidence to defend position. All comments are presented with logical thought process. Clearly states the two assignment criteria to be reviewed, but comments may lack some applicability to the selected criteria; or misses one criteria in some way.   The comments provided has limited perspective, unclear linkages, insights and/or applicability to topic and selected criteria or does not meet one or more of the criteria of the assignment.     The comments contain inaccurate information and is not consistent with current practice or with the assignment guidelines. No clear linkages provided; analysis is minimal.   The comments offer no insight or application to the assignment.
  Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)   15 Points 13 Points   12 Points 6 Points 0 Points
  Appropriate scholarly literature is present when providing analysis and feedback to the peer’s presentation. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited Analysis is partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited Analysis is partially supported by evidence. Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. Guidelines not used. In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.   Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support comments and feedback to peer.   Presentation contains no evidence-based practice reference or citation.
  Professionalism 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points        4 Points 0 Points
  The comments provided to peer are constructive and reflect respect and collegiality. The comments are relevant and pertain to the criteria reviewed and flows in a logical manner. The comments provided to peer are constructive and reflect respect and collegiality. May provided one unclear comment or a respond not entirely relevant to the criteria reviewed. The comments to peer are lacking and may be unclear or irrelevant to the criteria selected for review.   The comments to peer are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic and concepts are difficult to follow. The comments to peer are unclear to follow and are irrelevant to the topic and concepts.
  Grammar, Syntax, APA   5 points 4 points 3 points 1 point 0 points
  APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
Total Points Possible= 50
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic Guarantees
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Free unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free papers
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Progressive delivery
  • Plagiarism report
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double or single line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Writing quality papers is a TOP priority. One expert takes one order at a time.
The service package includes topic brainstorm, research, drafting, proofreading, plagiarism check, citation formatting, and revisions.

Money-back guarantee

We appreciate how valuable your time is. Hence, we make sure all custom papers are 100% original and delivered within the agreed time frame

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is written from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

We see it as our duty to follow all instruction the client provides. If you feel the completed paper does not meet your exact requirements, we will revise the paper if you let us know about the problem within 14 business days from the date of delivery.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, we use your personal data for legal purposes only and in accordance with personal data protection law. Your payment details are also secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

You can easily contact us with any question or issues you need to be addressed. Also, you have the opportunity to communicate directly with assigned writer, e-mail us, submit revision requests, chat with us online, or call our toll-free on our site. We are always available to our customers.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
-->