HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation

Attached is more instructions that needed to be followed

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 8, 9
  • Lesson
  • Link (Word doc): Source Evaluation Worksheet
  • Minimum of 5 scholarly sources

Instructions
Use the Source Evaluation Worksheet to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.

You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.

Click on the following link for an example of an annotation.

Link: Annotation Example

Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page

Grading
This activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 5

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quantity of Sources

5.0 pts 5 or more sources

4.25 pts 4 sources

3.75 pts 3 sources

3.0 pts 2 sources

0.0 pts 1 or no sources

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality /Reliability of Sources

5.0 pts All works are from scholarly sources.

4.25 pts Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source.

3.75 pts Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources.

3.0 pts Sources substantive or lower in quality.

0.0 pts Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recency of Sources

5.0 pts All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained

4.25 pts 1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

3.75 pts 2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

3.0 pts 3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

0.0 pts 4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Fluency of Annotations

25.0 pts All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.

21.25 pts Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.

18.75 pts Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay.

12.0 pts Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay.

0.0 pts Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA and Documentation

10.0 pts Citations are formatted correctly.

8.5 pts There are a few formatting errors.

7.5 pts There are some formatting errors.

6.0 pts There are many and/or frequent formatting errors.

0.0 pts There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document.

The post HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation appeared first on Submit Your Homeworks.


HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation was first posted on February 24, 2021 at 1:59 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@essaylords.us


HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation was first posted on February 24, 2021 at 2:07 am.
©2019 "Essay Lords | Bringing Excellence to students world wide". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@essaylords.us

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic Guarantees
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Free unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free papers
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Progressive delivery
  • Plagiarism report
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double or single line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Writing quality papers is a TOP priority. One expert takes one order at a time.
The service package includes topic brainstorm, research, drafting, proofreading, plagiarism check, citation formatting, and revisions.

Money-back guarantee

We appreciate how valuable your time is. Hence, we make sure all custom papers are 100% original and delivered within the agreed time frame

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is written from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

We see it as our duty to follow all instruction the client provides. If you feel the completed paper does not meet your exact requirements, we will revise the paper if you let us know about the problem within 14 business days from the date of delivery.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, we use your personal data for legal purposes only and in accordance with personal data protection law. Your payment details are also secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

You can easily contact us with any question or issues you need to be addressed. Also, you have the opportunity to communicate directly with assigned writer, e-mail us, submit revision requests, chat with us online, or call our toll-free on our site. We are always available to our customers.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
-->